• Home
  • About Jean
    • Philosophy of Learning
    • Areas of Expertise
    • Skills
    • Work Experience
  • Publications
  • Designers Toolkit
    • Great Assignments Toolkit
  • Jean on Twitter
  • Blog
  • Upcoming Conference Presentations
  • Conference Presentations
    • Training and eLearning Presentations
    • Literacy Presentations
    • Ministry Training
  • Ask Jean
  • Work Samples
Applestar Productions

Learning about learning

How NOT To Learn Something

4/26/2016

1 Comment

 
Last September, my name came up in some official roll-of-the-dice selection process and I got the authoritative dispatch informing me I had been selected for jury duty. I dutifully reported to the courthouse as required only to discover this was no ordinary sit around, read a book, knit a scarf and maybe get picked one day jury. 
 This was the Grand Jury at the Federal Level, and those who were selected for the honor would be committed to a full year of service, reporting to the courtroom every other Tuesday for a year.  There were 58 of us, and they needed to select 23 jurors and 6 alternates, so I figured I had a 50/50 chance of missing the winner's circle on this one. They pulled 29 names mine wasn't included. Phew.
Then we began the excuses and dismissals for people who had relatives involved in a trial, the jobs that would create hardship, the grandmother traveling overseas for the birth of a child who would miss several months, etc, and one by one, the pool diminished and a replacement was added. We were close to being finished, and a "what about...." question arose from a final candidate. She was dismissed, and my name was drawn.  <Cue Perry Mason music> What the heck, I figured. You can always learn something, right? I have fond childhood memories of the Perry Mason theme song playing as I walked down the hall to bed every night. It was one of my grandfather's favorite shows and it came on after the 11:00 news. 

Sworn to Secrecy

Our training included very stern instructions that we were not to discuss the proceedings of the trial with anyone. Spouse. Mother. Therapist. Nada. No one. It was especially important because this is Rhode Island, and as a small state, six degrees of separation is more like 2.31, so we aren't allowed to talk about the cases. I can tell you that it's like watching a mashup of Law and Order where the case changes at each commercial break. We've had 16 cases so far, and I've filled up three notebooks, which, by the way, must be left in the courtroom, along with the officially appointed court pen. We may not bring our cell phones past the security guards (lest we record something!) though we can house them in a little phone locker with the security staff by the metal detectors and sign them out at lunch. I was jonesing over that the first couple of weeks (How do I tell time?) but I got over that and now don't even bother to bring my iPhone along to sit in the little locker.

So What Does This Have to Do with Learning?

You may be wondering, since I can't talk about any of this, what it has to do with learning. LOTS! Let me explain. 

Read More
1 Comment

Innovating Learning: Bricolage

4/22/2016

2 Comments

 
I was fishing around for something on my computer today, and came across the 2014 Innovating Pedagogy Report put out by the Institute for Educational Technology at The Open University. This report is created for teachers rather than designers and corporate training people, but it is interesting to see the trends that were identified in K12 education a year and a half ago. They include:
  • Massive Online Open Learning
  • Learning Design Informed by Analytics
  • Flipped Classroom
  • BYOD (Bring Your Own Device)
  • Learning to Learn
  • Dynamic Assessment
  • Event-based Learning
  • Learning Through Storytelling
  • Threshold Concepts 
  • Bricolage
Picture
Bricolage 01 by Leonard Clagett
I find it curious how many of those trends exist in today's world of instructional design and elearning. Normally, the orbits of higher ed, K12, and corporate training spin in different realms, but there appears to be a convergence here. We are all chattering about storytelling and the value of assessment, MOOCs, analytics and the flipped classroom and troubled by BYOD. If you look at a conference brochure, you'll see lots of things about these concepts. The methods of improving our education & training all include examine a variety of components: knowing what is needed (in our world, gap analysis), delivery of content, application of content, and measuring the learners' absorption of it. It seems as though we are focused on the delivery and assessment these days. 

Leveraging Technology

Since the advent of readily accessible technology, we have online learning and measurement options available to us, and educators and trainers attempt to effectively incorporate technology as it has become ubiquitous in our daily lives. We all experiment with things, examine the results, talk about them, tweak them, and hopefully improve what was. I know in my 40 years of teaching, I've seen lots of things change. I've tried things that worked well and things that flopped. Yet people still learned. How much, well, that's the fly in the ointment.

​Two hundred years ago, there was the chalkboard, classroom, a teacher imparting knowledge, and lots of reading and rote memorization. We view that as primitive, yet it takes effort to read most 19th century literature because of the dense vocabulary and long sentences. Those writers were schooled in that "primitive" classroom and have language skills that far surpass what we have today. Their methods worked. Do I suggest we return to that? No. There is so much more to learn today. There's so much more available to us with the world at our fingertips on a computer. School systems need to decide what must be in the canon imparted to children, parsing out of that enormous mass of ideas to assemble a stable curriculum. Similarly, in corporate training, we struggle to figure out what the learner really needs, despite our subject matter expert's insistence that they need the trunkful of material they toss over the wall for us to put in a 10 minute elearning module. 

We Really Should Leverage Cross Disciplinary Conversation

I often wonder why we don't talk to one another much between K12, higher ed, early childhood and training. Granted, a key difference is the focus on children vs. adults, but there are excellent synergies that we can leverage between one another. That's why I pay attention to them all in my Twitter feed, and it's where I came across the report that sparked this post. I know that creative sparks occur when a novel concept is introduced to the mix, forcing thinking to go in new directions. Edward DeBono uses this in lateral thinking, and calls this process Random Entry. A totally unrelated idea takes our thinking in different directions. 

Here's a great example. In the report's article about learning analytics, Miller & Mork's (2013) value chain for discovery, integration, and exploitation of large-scale data is cited. This comes from an IT perspective,  and in a very simple way, shares how we could leverage the data we collect. A question comes up here: are we collecting the right things? There's considerable effort being invested in data mining of big data, and leveraging xAPI to track user activity. I wonder how much of the thinking in this image would be useful to us as we plan our evaluation strategies. ​I also wonder if having a representative from IT at the table would bring a divergent perspective as we consider evaluation and assessment possibilities so we might better leverage available data.
Picture

The Value of Bricolage

This is where the concept of bricolage comes in. Bricolage comes from the process of playing with things at hand. Examples include the child who builds a fort out of the sofa cushions, the artist who creates sculpture from household items, the teacher who does crafts with his students using paper towel rolls, and musicians who use spoons or pots and pans as instruments. According to Wikipedia, "Bricolage is a French loanword that means the process of improvisation in a human endeavor. The word is derived from the French verb bricoler ("to tinker"), with the English term DIY ("Do-it-yourself")." I like that. Improvisation in a human endeavor. One of the tenants of improvisation is "Yes, and". Here, the players must agree with whatever the other has started, and build from there. It's leveraging imagination. 

Dictionary.com defines bricolage as 
  1. a construction made of whatever materials are at hand; something created from a variety of available things.
  2. (in literature) a piece created from diverse resources.
  3. (in art) a piece of makeshift handiwork.
  4. the use of multiple, diverse research methods.

In education, MIT theorist of constructionism (different from constructivism) and founder of the MIT Media Lab, Seymour Papert was inspired by noting the difference between math class students and art class students carving a bar of soap. He wanted to find a way to teach math that had the inspiration of the soap carvers. Here, the soap leveraged divergent thinking for him, and from it, emerged the Logo software that allowed students to explore math concepts in a hands on fashion. He looked at problem solving in two ways: rather than being analytical, he deemed the learner a bricoleur, who learned through playing with things. Constructionism is actually learning by making. 

Bricolage is used in managerial and entrepreneurial literature, and seems to be tied with creativity. There's a difference though. It seems that bricolage is the result of problem solving. With the fort, the child wanted to create a hiding place, and improvised. The music maker had no drums, so the pot was inverted to become the percussionist's tool. It's a form of problem solving through experimentation.
Picture
Don't let the problem become a stopping point. Look for the "Yes, and" as well as the "How might we" to leverage what's at hand to build the next bricolage for learning.
In our world, bricolage includes blended learning, mLearning, elearning, and MOOCs. The solution came about to meet a need. Learners are attached to their smartphones, which makes computing portable, so we leverage that through mLearning. We need to eliminate costs for some training, so we improvised via webinars, or create blended components so there is less seat time.  These examples have been around for a while, and solved the "How might we" questions used in the world of UX. We answer with a solution that's a mashup of common tools used in a new paradigm. What was new, is now commonplace. 

Education is continually working to reinvent and improve itself and supplement what is already in place. As my grandmother used to say, "Necessity is the mother of invention." 
"How might we" is an excellent starting point to solve a problem.  Designers look at people, problems and solutions. What do we need to build next? Don't let the problem become a stopping point. Look for the "Yes, and" as well as the "How might we" to leverage what's at hand to build the next bricolage for learning.

How might we do what we do better? What's in your toolkit that could spur a new way? It doesn't always need to be something new. Bricolage comes from leveraging what's at hand. What can you combine to create better learning?
2 Comments

Pondering the Design Process

4/14/2016

4 Comments

 
I came across this interesting design model in a post from @TeachThought on the Design Cycle and the Genius Hour. This comes from Nigel Coutts (@ncoutts) who writes in the K12 teacher space on education trends, better thinking and the maker movement, among other things. The model is intended for classroom teachers working with design. It provides guidance to help children think like designers do, showing steps in the process and the interrelationships between them. It is important to note that it begins with identify the problem.

This model has roots in the Design Thinking process, which comes out of Stanford University. The graphic most often associated with their process looks like the image below. 
Picture
Image from The Genius Hour Design Cycle: A Process For Planning
Picture
Image from Stanford Design School

Design Thinking

Design thinking follows a process: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test. ​The first step is about understanding the user, empathizing with their needs and pain points. Next, a problem is defined that originates out of the user experience.
The designer then brainstorms many solutions, narrows focus to one solution, and creates a prototype, which is presented to the user for feedback. The feedback is applied and the design is reworked until an appropriate solution is created that is feasible for the designer and solves the user's problem.

​In design thinking, the user is central. This process is the way new products are created, originating from the research and development teams in organizations, but it is being increasingly adopted in other areas of the business. The buzz is growing around design thinking, hitting the mainstream in the September 2015 issue of the Harvard Business Review last year. In the lead article, Design Thinking Comes of Age, Jon Kolko, VP of Design at Blackbord says, ​
There’s a shift under way in large organizations, one that puts design much closer to the center of the enterprise. But the shift isn’t about aesthetics. It’s about applying the principles of design to the way people work. This new approach is in large part a response to the increasing complexity of modern technology and modern business....[A] design-centric culture transcends design as a role, imparting a set of principles to all people who help bring ideas to life.
What applicability do we see between instructional design and design thinking? Are there things we might leverage too?
​
If you're new to Design Thinking, check out the free crash course available from the dSchool at Stanford or their resource page for methods.
Design thinking is about creating solutions to problems. The user is always a central focus.
Instructional design should be the same, but most often the content winds up in the starring role.
How can we address this as instructional designers?

Read More
4 Comments

    Jean Marrapodi

    Teacher by training, learner by design.

    Archives

    January 2018
    July 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    July 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014

    Categories

    All
    Active Learning
    Assessment
    Bible
    Christmas
    Conferences
    Customer Service
    Design
    ELearning
    Learning
    Learning Theory
    Maker Movement
    Needs Assessment
    Performance Consulting
    Rebels
    Reflections
    SMEs
    Talent Development
    Talent Management
    Training
    Writing

    RSS Feed

Conference
​Resources

​Training/elearning
Literacy
Ministry.
Upcoming Events

Company
Info

About
Experience
Philosophy
Contact

Jean's
​Writing

Publications
Blog
Twitter Feed
© COPYRIGHT 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.