The traditional Instructional Design Model follows the ADDIE method:
In the
Development phase, the
instructional designer works with subject matter experts to pull the
content into the program. The instructional designer's role is to
ensure that the instructional methods and presentation accomplish the
goals of the course, and the subject matter expert's job is to ensure the
accuracy of the content. In the
Evaluation phase
the overall program is analyzed. Did the learners meet the goals of
the program? Did they gain knowledge, change behavior or attitudes,
or gain the desired skills? Assessments are generally made in one or
more of four levels:
ASSESS
In the Assessment process, the
instructional designer does a needs analysis of the learner's current
skillset and compares it with the desired outcome of the
learning. The performance gaps are defined and the training
intervention is created.
DESIGN
In the Design phase
the instructional designer determines the learning objectives to be met,
and the type of training process is selected. The form of the
intervention is chosen: will it be a classroom or online
program, a self study or collaborative type of project?
DEVELOP
IMPLEMENT
In the Implementation phase, the training program
is presented to the learners. Depending on the type of program, the
learners either attend classes, read manuals, experience simulations, do
exercises or any of a number of techniques to grasp the content.
EVALUATE
|
Kirpatrick Model of Evaluation | |
|
Level One |
These are often referred to a smile sheets. A series of Likert scales are used to assess the learner's reactions to the instruction, course material, content. Additional write in comments are encouraged. The information is statistically analyzed to provide a learner satisfaction score about the program. |
|
Level Two |
Level Two evaluations are generally given as a pretest and post test to measure the knowledge gained by the students in the class. The pretest measures the knowledge before the program, and the post test measures the information after the program. These are generally question and answer, paper based tests, although the questions may be given orally. |
|
Level Three |
Level Three evaluations are given by an observer, generally the trainer or supervisor to the learner, by utilizing a checklist and watching the learner using the new skills and concepts on the job. |
|
Level Four |
Level Four evaluations measure the impact of financial change that occurred as a result of the training intervention, less the cost of the training program. Questions regarding productivity and reduction of errors are used to measure the return on investment of the training. |
How can brain-based learning concepts be utilized in this process?
| [Home] | [Brain-Based Learning] | [Difference] | [Instructional Design] | [Resources] | [back to Applestar] |
|
copyright 2001 Send questions to Jean Marrapodi | |||||